{
  "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v2",
  "version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v2",
  "compat": {
    "backward_compatible_schema_versions": [
      "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1"
    ],
    "v1_fields_preserved": true
  },
  "contract_status": "preview",
  "distribution": "per_term_read_only_ai_handoff",
  "no_write_operations": true,
  "content_tier": "db_backed",
  "canonical": {
    "url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/ai-governance",
    "slug": "ai-governance",
    "locale": "en-US"
  },
  "summary": {
    "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1",
    "term_id": "117cf395-504c-5bd7-a2e1-185c8e2fc3b6",
    "canonical_slug": "ai-governance",
    "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/ai-governance",
    "locale": "en-US",
    "display_name": "AI Governance",
    "english_name": null,
    "abbreviation": null,
    "short_definition": "AI Governance means the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability. In practice, teams use it to decide approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features, while k…",
    "content_tier": "db_backed",
    "quality": "reviewed",
    "publication_status": "published_reviewed",
    "version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1",
    "last_reviewed_at": "2026-07-05T00:30:00.000Z",
    "sources_count": 1,
    "limitations_key": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22"
  },
  "aliases": [
    {
      "text": "AI Governance",
      "type": "display_name",
      "locale": "en-US"
    },
    {
      "text": "AI Governance",
      "type": "english_name",
      "locale": "en-US"
    },
    {
      "text": "AIガバナンス",
      "type": "localized_title",
      "locale": "ja-JP"
    }
  ],
  "content": {
    "definition": {
      "key": "definition",
      "title": "一言でいうと",
      "text": "AI Governance means the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability. In practice, teams use it to decide approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features, while keeping scope, evidence, ownership, and review boundaries explicit.",
      "items": []
    },
    "formula": {
      "key": "formula",
      "title": "計算の考え方",
      "text": "AI Governance is not governed by one universal formula. Evaluate it by scope, risk, evidence, and operating controls. Scope | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | Fixes what the term covers Exclusions | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Prevents overbroad interpretation Evidence | Official sources, logs, review, examples | Makes the decision auditable",
      "items": [
        "Scope | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | Fixes what the term covers",
        "Exclusions | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Prevents overbroad interpretation",
        "Evidence | Official sources, logs, review, examples | Makes the decision auditable"
      ]
    },
    "boundary": {
      "key": "boundary",
      "title": "含めるもの / 含めないもの",
      "text": "The boundary of AI Governance matters because it changes what teams approve, measure, and automate. Include | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | The core subject of the term Exclude | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Concepts that should be handled separately Make explicit | Owner, source, review date, approvals, exceptions | Reduces misuse",
      "items": [
        "Include | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | The core subject of the term",
        "Exclude | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Concepts that should be handled separately",
        "Make explicit | Owner, source, review date, approvals, exceptions | Reduces misuse"
      ]
    },
    "usage": [
      {
        "key": "meaning",
        "title": "意味",
        "text": "AI Governance is the term for the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability. It is used in business and technical decisions when teams need to decide approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features. In YogoQ Core it is treated as a practical decision term, not only as a dictionary label. The page separates what is included, what is excluded, what evidence is strong enough, and what a human or system must review. This matters because AI, security, legal, and finance terms often look familiar while changing responsibility, risk, compliance, or operating procedures in materially different ways.",
        "items": []
      },
      {
        "key": "usage",
        "title": "役立つ場面",
        "text": "A clear AI Governance definition lets teams align before deciding approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features. Separating policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response from model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team reduces scope creep and argument drift. Source-backed wording lowers the chance that search engines or AI agents quote the term incorrectly.",
        "items": [
          "A clear AI Governance definition lets teams align before deciding approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features.",
          "Separating policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response from model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team reduces scope creep and argument drift.",
          "Source-backed wording lowers the chance that search engines or AI agents quote the term incorrectly."
        ]
      },
      {
        "key": "usage",
        "title": "使い方のポイント",
        "text": null,
        "items": [
          "AI Governance is a foundational term for the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability.",
          "Use it when deciding approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features.",
          "It includes policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response and excludes model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team.",
          "Define safe-use conditions, not only restrictions should be checked before relying on it.",
          "For AI-readable use, pair the definition with official sources and review status."
        ]
      },
      {
        "key": "drivers",
        "title": "何が数字を動かすか",
        "text": "AI Governance becomes useful when the organization can apply the term consistently in real decisions. Context | Cross-functional AI use needs shared rules and exception handling Evidence | Prefer official standards, regulators, accounting rules, or auditable logs Granularity | Split broad labels into narrower concepts when decisions differ Ownership | Decide who approves and updates the definition",
        "items": [
          "Context | Cross-functional AI use needs shared rules and exception handling",
          "Evidence | Prefer official standards, regulators, accounting rules, or auditable logs",
          "Granularity | Split broad labels into narrower concepts when decisions differ",
          "Ownership | Decide who approves and updates the definition"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "misunderstandings": [
      {
        "key": "misunderstandings",
        "title": "判断するときの注意点",
        "text": "Do not use AI Governance as a vague label; make the boundary and evidence visible. Define safe-use conditions, not only restrictions Before treating related terms as synonyms, compare responsibility, data scope, and evaluation criteria. Vendor language or unverified industry phrases should stay as candidates until they pass editorial review.",
        "items": [
          "Define safe-use conditions, not only restrictions",
          "Before treating related terms as synonyms, compare responsibility, data scope, and evaluation criteria.",
          "Vendor language or unverified industry phrases should stay as candidates until they pass editorial review."
        ]
      },
      {
        "key": "misunderstandings",
        "title": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴",
        "text": null,
        "items": [
          "AI governance is only compliance paperwork is a common misconception. The practical boundary and evidence still matter.",
          "AI Governance does not automatically make a workflow safe or correct. Operations, review, and accountability are still needed.",
          "Knowing the English name or acronym is not enough; teams must understand the decision boundary."
        ]
      }
    ],
    "examples": [
      {
        "key": "examples",
        "title": "最小例",
        "text": "A company sees several teams adopting generative AI. AI governance defines approved tools, forbidden input data, publication review, external-send approvals, and log retention. High-impact uses require risk review, while low-risk drafting has a lighter path. Exceptions and incidents are tracked in one register, and the policy is reviewed quarterly for usability.",
        "items": []
      }
    ],
    "comparisons": [
      {
        "key": "comparisons",
        "title": "似ている言葉との違い",
        "text": "AI Governance | the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability | Used for approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features Responsible AI and AI risk management | Related concept | Compare when scope or accountability differs Generic explanation | Context-free paraphrase | Usually too weak for decisions",
        "items": [
          "AI Governance | the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability | Used for approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features",
          "Responsible AI and AI risk management | Related concept | Compare when scope or accountability differs",
          "Generic explanation | Context-free paraphrase | Usually too weak for decisions"
        ]
      },
      {
        "key": "related_metrics",
        "title": "一緒に見る指標",
        "text": "AI Governance is easier to use when compared with adjacent concepts. Responsible AI and AI risk management | Adjacent concept | Prevents false synonym matching Evidence | Official source or standard | Supports trust and citation Review state | Reviewed / Verified / Draft | Controls public and AI exposure",
        "items": [
          "Responsible AI and AI risk management | Adjacent concept | Prevents false synonym matching",
          "Evidence | Official source or standard | Supports trust and citation",
          "Review state | Reviewed / Verified / Draft | Controls public and AI exposure"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "faq": [
      {
        "question": "What is AI Governance used for?",
        "answer": "It helps teams decide approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features with a shared definition and boundary."
      },
      {
        "question": "What does AI Governance include?",
        "answer": "It mainly includes policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response; model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team should be handled separately."
      },
      {
        "question": "Can AI agents cite this term?",
        "answer": "They can cite it more safely when the reviewed definition, official sources, and review date are used together. High-impact decisions still need human review."
      }
    ]
  },
  "source_refs": [
    "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
    "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
    "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
  ],
  "sources": {
    "source_refs": [
      "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
      "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
      "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
    ],
    "visible_sources": [
      {
        "label": "NIST AI Risk Management Framework",
        "url": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/nist.ai.100-1.pdf",
        "kind": "tier_s"
      }
    ]
  },
  "related_terms": [
    {
      "topic_id": "slug:ai-evaluation",
      "canonical_slug": "ai-evaluation",
      "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/ai-evaluation",
      "title": "AI Evaluation",
      "relation_type": "used_together"
    },
    {
      "topic_id": "slug:generative-ai",
      "canonical_slug": "generative-ai",
      "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/generative-ai",
      "title": "Generative AI",
      "relation_type": "related"
    }
  ],
  "relations": [
    {
      "term_id": "slug:ai-evaluation",
      "canonical_slug": "ai-evaluation",
      "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/ai-evaluation",
      "display_name": "AI Evaluation",
      "relation_type": "related",
      "source_relation_type": "used_together"
    },
    {
      "term_id": "slug:generative-ai",
      "canonical_slug": "generative-ai",
      "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/generative-ai",
      "display_name": "Generative AI",
      "relation_type": "related",
      "source_relation_type": "related"
    }
  ],
  "chunk_ids": [
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:definition:4843605754f5c5e9",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:formula:005850afe2f5233f",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:boundary:efa3fe0375eea4c7",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:meaning:2c05fda24d492473",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:usage:cf31374564cb48b8",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:usage:3efcb56a8bb09b44",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:drivers:de707f93c4dc6730",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:misunderstandings:67bb85bd6b69eddc",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:misunderstandings:37495205c7fca792",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:examples:afa88c38e9592e01",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:comparisons:db01a0f5105bc9fd",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:related_metrics:e4c7b5592b2b1b54",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:faq:f5912cd274949bf4",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:faq:170373918e677a93",
    "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:faq:ac6dd4876243e55e"
  ],
  "chunks": [
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:definition:4843605754f5c5e9",
      "section_key": "definition",
      "heading": "一言でいうと",
      "text": "AI Governance means the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability. In practice, teams use it to decide approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features, while keeping scope, evidence, ownership, and review boundaries explicit.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "4843605754f5c5e92238ee936b04f55eeda15b749afef418ac07d61e99e13bf5"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:formula:005850afe2f5233f",
      "section_key": "formula",
      "heading": "計算の考え方",
      "text": "AI Governance is not governed by one universal formula. Evaluate it by scope, risk, evidence, and operating controls. Scope | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | Fixes what the term covers Exclusions | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Prevents overbroad interpretation Evidence | Official sources, logs, review, examples | Makes the decision auditable Scope | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | Fixes what the term covers Exclusions | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Prevents overbroad interpretation Evidence | Official sources, logs, review, examples | Makes the decision auditable",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "005850afe2f5233f884c9b52b36d2a152a27db9ec85239178ee8fe48a6b6ab25"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:boundary:efa3fe0375eea4c7",
      "section_key": "boundary",
      "heading": "含めるもの / 含めないもの",
      "text": "The boundary of AI Governance matters because it changes what teams approve, measure, and automate. Include | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | The core subject of the term Exclude | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Concepts that should be handled separately Make explicit | Owner, source, review date, approvals, exceptions | Reduces misuse Include | policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response | The core subject of the term Exclude | model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team | Concepts that should be handled separately Make explicit | Owner, source, review date, approvals, exceptions | Reduces misuse",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "efa3fe0375eea4c7d90bf9c8b6d8e4f2ad63726c4d8a688c66a1cb71faafea7f"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:meaning:2c05fda24d492473",
      "section_key": "meaning",
      "heading": "意味",
      "text": "AI Governance is the term for the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability. It is used in business and technical decisions when teams need to decide approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features. In YogoQ Core it is treated as a practical decision term, not only as a dictionary label. The page separates what is included, what is excluded, what evidence is strong enough, and what a human or system must review. This matters because AI, security, legal, and finance terms often look familiar while changing responsibility, risk, compliance, or operating procedures in materially different ways.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "2c05fda24d4924731388e510bfbc9ba2cabb96906d4e09b80c45e01b758978bb"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:usage:cf31374564cb48b8",
      "section_key": "usage",
      "heading": "役立つ場面",
      "text": "A clear AI Governance definition lets teams align before deciding approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features. Separating policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response from model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team reduces scope creep and argument drift. Source-backed wording lowers the chance that search engines or AI agents quote the term incorrectly. A clear AI Governance definition lets teams align before deciding approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features. Separating policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response from model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team reduces scope creep and argument drift. Source-backed wording lowers the chance that search engines or AI agents quote the term incorrectly.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "cf31374564cb48b81c4094ebc25c79305d65c3cc5cb96ec44cfb17def0cd6275"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:usage:3efcb56a8bb09b44",
      "section_key": "usage",
      "heading": "使い方のポイント",
      "text": "AI Governance is a foundational term for the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability. Use it when deciding approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features. It includes policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response and excludes model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team. Define safe-use conditions, not only restrictions should be checked before relying on it. For AI-readable use, pair the definition with official sources and review status.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "3efcb56a8bb09b44b7e392c3ce0c070767715779039e4039937f4e9d5790a3eb"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:drivers:de707f93c4dc6730",
      "section_key": "drivers",
      "heading": "何が数字を動かすか",
      "text": "AI Governance becomes useful when the organization can apply the term consistently in real decisions. Context | Cross-functional AI use needs shared rules and exception handling Evidence | Prefer official standards, regulators, accounting rules, or auditable logs Granularity | Split broad labels into narrower concepts when decisions differ Ownership | Decide who approves and updates the definition Context | Cross-functional AI use needs shared rules and exception handling Evidence | Prefer official standards, regulators, accounting rules, or auditable logs Granularity | Split broad labels into narrower concepts when decisions differ Ownership | Decide who approves and updates the definition",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "de707f93c4dc6730e5eadd9d68c74eec132c6df8415bcfbb51c3a7e031fb92d8"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:misunderstandings:67bb85bd6b69eddc",
      "section_key": "misunderstandings",
      "heading": "判断するときの注意点",
      "text": "Do not use AI Governance as a vague label; make the boundary and evidence visible. Define safe-use conditions, not only restrictions Before treating related terms as synonyms, compare responsibility, data scope, and evaluation criteria. Vendor language or unverified industry phrases should stay as candidates until they pass editorial review. Define safe-use conditions, not only restrictions Before treating related terms as synonyms, compare responsibility, data scope, and evaluation criteria. Vendor language or unverified industry phrases should stay as candidates until they pass editorial review.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "67bb85bd6b69eddc540aca8f805919199b544298b05a9792a4ab0c06dab63c87"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:misunderstandings:37495205c7fca792",
      "section_key": "misunderstandings",
      "heading": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴",
      "text": "AI governance is only compliance paperwork is a common misconception. The practical boundary and evidence still matter. AI Governance does not automatically make a workflow safe or correct. Operations, review, and accountability are still needed. Knowing the English name or acronym is not enough; teams must understand the decision boundary.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "37495205c7fca792728aed4927ac124db656c058a917b8897aeac4f0565c2fb1"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:examples:afa88c38e9592e01",
      "section_key": "examples",
      "heading": "最小例",
      "text": "A company sees several teams adopting generative AI. AI governance defines approved tools, forbidden input data, publication review, external-send approvals, and log retention. High-impact uses require risk review, while low-risk drafting has a lighter path. Exceptions and incidents are tracked in one register, and the policy is reviewed quarterly for usability.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "afa88c38e9592e01e5d178850c21f73ec908262e03186c03388216353dd95c89"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:comparisons:db01a0f5105bc9fd",
      "section_key": "comparisons",
      "heading": "似ている言葉との違い",
      "text": "AI Governance | the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability | Used for approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features Responsible AI and AI risk management | Related concept | Compare when scope or accountability differs Generic explanation | Context-free paraphrase | Usually too weak for decisions AI Governance | the system for managing AI purpose, permissions, responsibility, risk, and auditability | Used for approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features Responsible AI and AI risk management | Related concept | Compare when scope or accountability differs Generic explanation | Context-free paraphrase | Usually too weak for decisions",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "db01a0f5105bc9fdddeb32b6e7c5475729de9a714863c3246f43b64ce11c7825"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:related_metrics:e4c7b5592b2b1b54",
      "section_key": "related_metrics",
      "heading": "一緒に見る指標",
      "text": "AI Governance is easier to use when compared with adjacent concepts. Responsible AI and AI risk management | Adjacent concept | Prevents false synonym matching Evidence | Official source or standard | Supports trust and citation Review state | Reviewed / Verified / Draft | Controls public and AI exposure Responsible AI and AI risk management | Adjacent concept | Prevents false synonym matching Evidence | Official source or standard | Supports trust and citation Review state | Reviewed / Verified / Draft | Controls public and AI exposure",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "e4c7b5592b2b1b54553c42bf072cf0e0eccbaad465a5243807925ddaee3bbc2d"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:faq:f5912cd274949bf4",
      "section_key": "faq",
      "heading": "What is AI Governance used for?",
      "text": "What is AI Governance used for? It helps teams decide approval, oversight, and operating accountability for AI features with a shared definition and boundary.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "f5912cd274949bf4060d6a9d8955d2f992bf5aa78c3cf59abe70e4b9323ea30f"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:faq:170373918e677a93",
      "section_key": "faq",
      "heading": "What does AI Governance include?",
      "text": "What does AI Governance include? It mainly includes policy, roles, risk review, change management, and incident response; model selection alone or rules owned only by the engineering team should be handled separately.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "170373918e677a93a7f02aa833329ed3a24e9025a8019649dd68aa46560ff0c6"
    },
    {
      "chunk_id": "core:chunk:ai-governance:en-US:faq:ac6dd4876243e55e",
      "section_key": "faq",
      "heading": "Can AI agents cite this term?",
      "text": "Can AI agents cite this term? They can cite it more safely when the reviewed definition, official sources, and review date are used together. High-impact decisions still need human review.",
      "source_refs": [
        "concept:ai-governance:en-US",
        "concept:ai-governance:ja-JP",
        "core-product-update-remaining-pack-v1:ai-governance"
      ],
      "content_hash": "ac6dd4876243e55e55f1e3e413c648f901018016ae61006341f7f627a8bf747b"
    }
  ],
  "content_hash": "88611547790d825cde1de7b7d33ec8ca183fe0e02eaa16f9467174e127cb5630",
  "hash_algorithm": "sha256",
  "rag": {
    "chunk_id_policy": "core:chunk:{canonical_slug}:{locale}:{section_key}:{sha256_16}",
    "content_hash_policy": "sha256_stable_json",
    "source_refs_precision": "source_object_ref_or_source_key_current_snapshot"
  },
  "quality": {
    "content_tier": "db_backed",
    "quality": "reviewed",
    "publication_status": "published_reviewed",
    "source_count": 1,
    "last_reviewed_at": "2026-07-05T00:30:00.000Z",
    "trust_policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22"
  },
  "limitations": {
    "policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22",
    "professional_advice_boundary": "reference_only_not_professional_advice",
    "text": "This page is reference information for research and learning. For accounting, legal, finance, health, security, or other individual decisions, confirm against primary sources or qualified professionals.",
    "items": [
      "Public pages support general understanding and practical context; they are not professional advice for individual cases.",
      "Fast-changing information such as regulations, accounting standards, prices, product specs, and legal requirements should be checked against primary sources before final decisions.",
      "Even when AI-assisted drafting or audit is used, publication relies on quality gates and human-readable evidence."
    ]
  }
}