{ "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v2", "version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v2", "compat": { "backward_compatible_schema_versions": [ "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1" ], "v1_fields_preserved": true }, "contract_status": "preview", "distribution": "per_term_read_only_ai_handoff", "no_write_operations": true, "content_tier": "db_backed", "canonical": { "url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "slug": "economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "locale": "en-US" }, "summary": { "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "term_id": "0d36cfac-589f-56a5-80a5-b34d0ec649d6", "canonical_slug": "economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "locale": "en-US", "display_name": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model", "english_name": null, "abbreviation": null, "short_definition": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model is useful when a team needs a shared decision language, not just a definition.", "content_tier": "db_backed", "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "last_reviewed_at": "2026-05-21T17:38:24.146598+00:00", "sources_count": 2, "limitations_key": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "aliases": [ { "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model", "type": "display_name", "locale": "en-US" }, { "text": "コスト・ベネフィット・アナリシス・マチュリティ・モデル", "type": "katakana", "locale": "en-US" }, { "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model", "type": "english_name", "locale": "en-US" }, { "text": "費用便益分析成熟度モデル", "type": "localized_title", "locale": "ja-JP" } ], "content": { "definition": { "key": "definition", "title": "一言でいうと", "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model is useful when a team needs a shared decision language, not just a definition.", "items": [] }, "formula": null, "boundary": null, "usage": [ { "key": "meaning", "title": "意味", "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model describes a practical concept that helps teams frame a situation, compare options, and decide the next operating move. The value is not the label itself; it is the discipline of defining scope, evidence, owner, decision consequence, and review timing before the team acts. A good definition also states what is excluded, which signal changes the interpretation, and how the term should affect planning, prioritization, or accountability.", "items": [] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "役立つ場面", "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model is appropriate when the team has a real choice to make, enough evidence to compare options, and a named owner who can change execution after the decision. It is less useful for casual vocabulary alignment because the value comes from forcing scope, criteria, trade-offs, review cadence, and reversal signals into the same artifact before work starts.", "items": [ "Priority | Clarifies what matters now | Prevents scattered execution", "Ownership | Makes the responsible team explicit | Reduces handoff ambiguity", "Evidence | Connects the concept to observable facts | Keeps decisions from becoming opinion-driven" ] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "使い方のポイント", "text": "Run Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model as a decision sequence, not as a discussion topic. Frame the decision, owner, deadline, and operating context before asking the team to compare options. List the options, constraints, assumptions, and evidence so each path can be judged on the same basis. Define the decision criteria and weight the criteria before anyone argues for a preferred answer. Commit to the selected path, record the trade-off, and name the signal that would justify changing course. Review the result on a fixed cadence and update the artifact when the market, customer, or data changes. A practical Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model artifact should contain the decision statement, owner, deadline, scope, excluded cases, options, evidence, criteria, trade-offs, selected path, review cadence, and reversal signal. The artifact should be short enough to use in an operating review but specific enough that another team can understand why the decision was made, what evidence mattered, and which assumptions must be checked before the next planning cycle. Use Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model with a clear context and decision owner. Define the scope before comparing alternatives. Separate facts, assumptions, and open questions. Tie the concept to a decision, not only to a vocabulary explanation. Review the definition when the customer, market, or operating context changes. Record the owner and review date so the term remains useful after execution starts.", "items": [ "Frame the decision, owner, deadline, and operating context before asking the team to compare options.", "List the options, constraints, assumptions, and evidence so each path can be judged on the same basis.", "Define the decision criteria and weight the criteria before anyone argues for a preferred answer.", "Commit to the selected path, record the trade-off, and name the signal that would justify changing course.", "Review the result on a fixed cadence and update the artifact when the market, customer, or data changes.", "Define the scope before comparing alternatives.", "Separate facts, assumptions, and open questions.", "Tie the concept to a decision, not only to a vocabulary explanation.", "Review the definition when the customer, market, or operating context changes.", "Record the owner and review date so the term remains useful after execution starts." ] } ], "misunderstandings": [ { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "判断するときの注意点", "text": "Use Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model as a decision aid, not as a substitute for judgment. Do not hide weak evidence behind a clean framework. Do not compare options with inconsistent assumptions. Do not keep using the framework after the market, customer, or operating constraint changes.", "items": [ "Do not hide weak evidence behind a clean framework.", "Do not compare options with inconsistent assumptions.", "Do not keep using the framework after the market, customer, or operating constraint changes." ] }, { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴", "text": null, "items": [ "Misconception | It is only a dictionary term | In practice it should change a decision or operating behavior", "Misconception | Everyone means the same thing | Teams should write the scope and assumptions", "Misconception | It is always positive | The term can reveal constraints, risks, or reasons not to act", "Using the framework after the decision is already made turns it into justification instead of decision support.", "Comparing options with different scopes or time horizons creates false precision and weakens accountability.", "Leaving the review owner unnamed makes the artifact stale even when conditions change after launch." ] } ], "examples": [ { "key": "examples", "title": "最小例", "text": "A team discussing Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model first writes the decision it needs to make, the evidence it has, the boundary of the term, and the trade-off it is willing to accept. The team then compares options using the same scope and records why one path is better for the current operating period. In the next review, the owner checks whether the chosen action changed the expected signal or whether the definition needs to be tightened. This makes the term useful in planning, review, and handoff conversations instead of leaving it as a glossary label.", "items": [] } ], "comparisons": [ { "key": "comparisons", "title": "似ている言葉との違い", "text": "Compare Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model with adjacent concepts before deciding. Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model | Current concept | Use when the team needs the primary decision lens Adjacent metric or framework | Supporting lens | Use when the team needs evidence or process detail General vocabulary | Broad explanation | Use only for orientation, not final decision-making", "items": [ "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model | Current concept | Use when the team needs the primary decision lens", "Adjacent metric or framework | Supporting lens | Use when the team needs evidence or process detail", "General vocabulary | Broad explanation | Use only for orientation, not final decision-making" ] } ], "faq": [ { "question": "When should I use Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model?", "answer": "Use it when the team needs to decide scope, priority, owner, or trade-off, not when it only needs a short definition." }, { "question": "What makes Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model useful in practice?", "answer": "It becomes useful when it is tied to evidence, a decision owner, and a concrete next operating choice." }, { "question": "What should I avoid?", "answer": "Avoid using the term as a label without clarifying assumptions, boundaries, and how success will be judged." } ] }, "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "sources": { "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "visible_sources": [ { "label": "Principles of Economics 3e (OpenStax)", "url": "https://openstax.org/details/books/principles-economics-3e", "kind": "tier_s" }, { "label": "Principles of Finance (OpenStax)", "url": "https://openstax.org/details/books/principles-finance", "kind": "tier_s" } ] }, "related_terms": [ { "topic_id": "c85704b8-22ac-524f-a490-14623a933e2f", "canonical_slug": "economics-cost-benefit-analysis-implementation-blueprint", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-cost-benefit-analysis-implementation-blueprint", "title": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Implementation Blueprint", "relation_type": "next" }, { "topic_id": "7d183d13-599e-546e-a1e7-2acd3ae3270e", "canonical_slug": "economics-cost-benefit-analysis-scorecard", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-cost-benefit-analysis-scorecard", "title": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Scorecard", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "b82a2a67-1035-5c4e-a0fa-5d39b4d34abf", "canonical_slug": "economics-policy-evaluation-decision-framework", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-policy-evaluation-decision-framework", "title": "Policy Evaluation Decision Framework", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "c6f71aa1-4993-5132-b396-00061c76cb20", "canonical_slug": "economics-policy-evaluation-operating-playbook", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-policy-evaluation-operating-playbook", "title": "Policy Evaluation Operating Playbook", "relation_type": "used_together" } ], "relations": [ { "term_id": "c85704b8-22ac-524f-a490-14623a933e2f", "canonical_slug": "economics-cost-benefit-analysis-implementation-blueprint", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-cost-benefit-analysis-implementation-blueprint", "display_name": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Implementation Blueprint", "relation_type": "related", "source_relation_type": "next" }, { "term_id": "7d183d13-599e-546e-a1e7-2acd3ae3270e", "canonical_slug": "economics-cost-benefit-analysis-scorecard", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-cost-benefit-analysis-scorecard", "display_name": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Scorecard", "relation_type": "related", "source_relation_type": "used_together" }, { "term_id": "b82a2a67-1035-5c4e-a0fa-5d39b4d34abf", "canonical_slug": "economics-policy-evaluation-decision-framework", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-policy-evaluation-decision-framework", "display_name": "Policy Evaluation Decision Framework", "relation_type": "related", "source_relation_type": "used_together" }, { "term_id": "c6f71aa1-4993-5132-b396-00061c76cb20", "canonical_slug": "economics-policy-evaluation-operating-playbook", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/economics-policy-evaluation-operating-playbook", "display_name": "Policy Evaluation Operating Playbook", "relation_type": "related", "source_relation_type": "used_together" } ], "chunk_ids": [ "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:definition:b139f84454af6f10", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:meaning:771f618c4d5c9572", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:usage:98c00874c2fbaaa3", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:usage:ba3bfe549dd3b7fe", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:misunderstandings:94871ee8cbf80354", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:misunderstandings:9cc85ff6d3c361bc", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:examples:fdbb073418c6538b", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:comparisons:6a3c2315227b8f51", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:faq:847feaf604d42273", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:faq:18976cdca1d79405", "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:faq:61f02dc73e2a2f45" ], "chunks": [ { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:definition:b139f84454af6f10", "section_key": "definition", "heading": "一言でいうと", "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model is useful when a team needs a shared decision language, not just a definition.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "b139f84454af6f10430867807975f89a249590035b787e8a4016aaf5b78b4040" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:meaning:771f618c4d5c9572", "section_key": "meaning", "heading": "意味", "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model describes a practical concept that helps teams frame a situation, compare options, and decide the next operating move. The value is not the label itself; it is the discipline of defining scope, evidence, owner, decision consequence, and review timing before the team acts. A good definition also states what is excluded, which signal changes the interpretation, and how the term should affect planning, prioritization, or accountability.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "771f618c4d5c95722b0a4e752c0a2831df54dcf5cae9fdfcaf98c8ec2094f275" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:usage:98c00874c2fbaaa3", "section_key": "usage", "heading": "役立つ場面", "text": "Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model is appropriate when the team has a real choice to make, enough evidence to compare options, and a named owner who can change execution after the decision. It is less useful for casual vocabulary alignment because the value comes from forcing scope, criteria, trade-offs, review cadence, and reversal signals into the same artifact before work starts. Priority | Clarifies what matters now | Prevents scattered execution Ownership | Makes the responsible team explicit | Reduces handoff ambiguity Evidence | Connects the concept to observable facts | Keeps decisions from becoming opinion-driven", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "98c00874c2fbaaa3cd3ceb63b97b7d803221106ab04a58fe39107c84fb9d4af7" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:usage:ba3bfe549dd3b7fe", "section_key": "usage", "heading": "使い方のポイント", "text": "Run Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model as a decision sequence, not as a discussion topic. Frame the decision, owner, deadline, and operating context before asking the team to compare options. List the options, constraints, assumptions, and evidence so each path can be judged on the same basis. Define the decision criteria and weight the criteria before anyone argues for a preferred answer. Commit to the selected path, record the trade-off, and name the signal that would justify changing course. Review the result on a fixed cadence and update the artifact when the market, customer, or data changes. A practical Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model artifact should contain the decision statement, owner, deadline, scope, excluded cases, options, evidence, criteria, trade-offs, selected path, review cadence, and reversal signal. The artifact should be short enough to use in an operating review but specific enough that another team can understand why the decision was made, what evidence mattered, and which assumptions must be checked before the next planning cycle. Use Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model with a clear context and decision owner. Define the scope before comparing alternatives. Separate facts, assumptions, and open questions. Tie the concept to a decision, not only to a vocabulary explanation. Review the definition when the customer, market, or operating context changes. Record the owner and review date so the term remains useful after execution starts. Frame the decision, owner, deadline, and operating context before asking the team to compare options. List the options, constraints, assumptions, and evidence so each path can be judged on the same basis. Define the decision criteria and weight the criteria before anyone argues for a preferred answer. Commit to the selected path, record the trade-off, and name the signal that would justify changing course. Review the result on a fixed cadence and update the artifact when the market, customer, or data changes. Define the scope before comparing alternatives. Separate facts, assumptions, and open questions. Tie the concept to a decision, not only to a vocabulary explanation. Review the definition when the customer, market, or operating context changes. Record the owner and review date so the term remains useful after execution starts.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "ba3bfe549dd3b7fea0b5f9a661b19cbf37db9c07b22e15a947233f2c080e0d0a" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:misunderstandings:94871ee8cbf80354", "section_key": "misunderstandings", "heading": "判断するときの注意点", "text": "Use Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model as a decision aid, not as a substitute for judgment. Do not hide weak evidence behind a clean framework. Do not compare options with inconsistent assumptions. Do not keep using the framework after the market, customer, or operating constraint changes. Do not hide weak evidence behind a clean framework. Do not compare options with inconsistent assumptions. Do not keep using the framework after the market, customer, or operating constraint changes.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "94871ee8cbf803547c51b7e2d54cbdc0aee53d3728f50ca7876f6b19de927586" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:misunderstandings:9cc85ff6d3c361bc", "section_key": "misunderstandings", "heading": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴", "text": "Misconception | It is only a dictionary term | In practice it should change a decision or operating behavior Misconception | Everyone means the same thing | Teams should write the scope and assumptions Misconception | It is always positive | The term can reveal constraints, risks, or reasons not to act Using the framework after the decision is already made turns it into justification instead of decision support. Comparing options with different scopes or time horizons creates false precision and weakens accountability. Leaving the review owner unnamed makes the artifact stale even when conditions change after launch.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "9cc85ff6d3c361bcd3d4b5946479cccd1edada16df0365d20e745c046d7365cb" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:examples:fdbb073418c6538b", "section_key": "examples", "heading": "最小例", "text": "A team discussing Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model first writes the decision it needs to make, the evidence it has, the boundary of the term, and the trade-off it is willing to accept. The team then compares options using the same scope and records why one path is better for the current operating period. In the next review, the owner checks whether the chosen action changed the expected signal or whether the definition needs to be tightened. This makes the term useful in planning, review, and handoff conversations instead of leaving it as a glossary label.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "fdbb073418c6538b6ea58304fb47b8f07205a923e364aa91e00909caf5ffa8b2" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:comparisons:6a3c2315227b8f51", "section_key": "comparisons", "heading": "似ている言葉との違い", "text": "Compare Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model with adjacent concepts before deciding. Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model | Current concept | Use when the team needs the primary decision lens Adjacent metric or framework | Supporting lens | Use when the team needs evidence or process detail General vocabulary | Broad explanation | Use only for orientation, not final decision-making Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model | Current concept | Use when the team needs the primary decision lens Adjacent metric or framework | Supporting lens | Use when the team needs evidence or process detail General vocabulary | Broad explanation | Use only for orientation, not final decision-making", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "6a3c2315227b8f511fe5871d3c9e4241afac8f51b4d819ae694b0e943e326458" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:faq:847feaf604d42273", "section_key": "faq", "heading": "When should I use Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model?", "text": "When should I use Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model? Use it when the team needs to decide scope, priority, owner, or trade-off, not when it only needs a short definition.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "847feaf604d422734351f5a6546d4763d296352c09ff417fbe9ccdfdf6b5b79b" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:faq:18976cdca1d79405", "section_key": "faq", "heading": "What makes Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model useful in practice?", "text": "What makes Cost-Benefit Analysis Maturity Model useful in practice? It becomes useful when it is tied to evidence, a decision owner, and a concrete next operating choice.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "18976cdca1d794057622754fdc137c2240cd6b7f5c722c451c74637f0227e206" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US:faq:61f02dc73e2a2f45", "section_key": "faq", "heading": "What should I avoid?", "text": "What should I avoid? Avoid using the term as a label without clarifying assumptions, boundaries, and how success will be judged.", "source_refs": [ "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:en-US", "framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model:ja-JP", "catalog:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model", "core-term-page-10000-09:framework:economics-cost-benefit-analysis-maturity-model" ], "content_hash": "61f02dc73e2a2f450bd902b3832e8f2398a9bfe474eb9ad1eeca5c4c2e636ec8" } ], "content_hash": "086f5712e88ca3baad3ef65abcc091dca7510f27a3d7371cab0fb81ba1bcfb2d", "hash_algorithm": "sha256", "rag": { "chunk_id_policy": "core:chunk:{canonical_slug}:{locale}:{section_key}:{sha256_16}", "content_hash_policy": "sha256_stable_json", "source_refs_precision": "source_object_ref_or_source_key_current_snapshot" }, "quality": { "content_tier": "db_backed", "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "source_count": 2, "last_reviewed_at": "2026-05-21T17:38:24.146598+00:00", "trust_policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "limitations": { "policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22", "professional_advice_boundary": "reference_only_not_professional_advice", "text": "This page is reference information for research and learning. For accounting, legal, finance, health, security, or other individual decisions, confirm against primary sources or qualified professionals.", "items": [ "Public pages support general understanding and practical context; they are not professional advice for individual cases.", "Fast-changing information such as regulations, accounting standards, prices, product specs, and legal requirements should be checked against primary sources before final decisions.", "Even when AI-assisted drafting or audit is used, publication relies on quality gates and human-readable evidence." ] } }