{ "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v2", "version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v2", "compat": { "backward_compatible_schema_versions": [ "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1" ], "v1_fields_preserved": true }, "contract_status": "preview", "distribution": "per_term_read_only_ai_handoff", "no_write_operations": true, "content_tier": "db_backed", "canonical": { "url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/supplier-relationship-health", "slug": "supplier-relationship-health", "locale": "ko-KR" }, "summary": { "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "term_id": "23da7a9a-48d5-5eaf-aacc-281059c4e742", "canonical_slug": "supplier-relationship-health", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/supplier-relationship-health", "locale": "ko-KR", "display_name": "サプライヤー関係健全度", "english_name": "Supplier Relationship Health", "abbreviation": null, "short_definition": "Supplier Relationship Health is the practical assessment of whether an important supplier relationship is reliable, transparent, economically sound, and able to improve. It is used for whether to deepen, fix, diversify,…", "content_tier": "db_backed", "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "last_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z", "sources_count": 2, "limitations_key": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "aliases": [ { "text": "サプライヤー関係健全度", "type": "display_name", "locale": "ko-KR" }, { "text": "Supplier Relationship Health", "type": "english_name", "locale": "en-US" }, { "text": "サプライヤー・リレーションシップ・ヘルス", "type": "katakana", "locale": "ko-KR" }, { "text": "サプライヤー関係健全度", "type": "localized_title", "locale": "ja-JP" } ], "content": { "definition": { "key": "definition", "title": "一言でいうと", "text": "Supplier Relationship Health is the practical assessment of whether an important supplier relationship is reliable, transparent, economically sound, and able to improve. It is used for whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship by reading delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed and deciding whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship.", "items": [] }, "formula": null, "boundary": { "key": "boundary", "title": "含めるもの / 含めないもの", "text": "Keep the inclusion and exclusion rules stable so decisions can be compared over time. Include | performance, transparency, responsiveness, commercial balance, improvement actions | Health includes both results and relationship behavior Exclude | friendliness without delivery evidence, price alone, isolated anecdotes | They can misread the relationship Define explicitly | service threshold, escalation owner, joint review cadence, exit trigger | Healthy relationships still need decision rules", "items": [ "Include | performance, transparency, responsiveness, commercial balance, improvement actions | Health includes both results and relationship behavior", "Exclude | friendliness without delivery evidence, price alone, isolated anecdotes | They can misread the relationship", "Define explicitly | service threshold, escalation owner, joint review cadence, exit trigger | Healthy relationships still need decision rules" ] }, "usage": [ { "key": "meaning", "title": "意味", "text": "Supplier Relationship Health is a practical concept for improving operating, risk, and organization decisions. It makes delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed visible under shared assumptions so teams can decide whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship. Without clear supplier relationship health boundaries, owners, and review cadence, teams can improve one local view while moving supplier relationship health pressure elsewhere.", "items": [] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "役立つ場面", "text": "Supplier Relationship Health changes decisions by turning delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed into evidence for where scarce capacity and budget should go. It sets boundaries so improvement, control, resilience, and customer impact can be weighed in the same review. It makes whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship operational by naming owners, triggers, and review cadence instead of leaving the concept as a discussion point.", "items": [ "Supplier Relationship Health changes decisions by turning delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed into evidence for where scarce capacity and budget should go.", "It sets boundaries so improvement, control, resilience, and customer impact can be weighed in the same review.", "It makes whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship operational by naming owners, triggers, and review cadence instead of leaving the concept as a discussion point." ] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "使い方のポイント", "text": null, "items": [ "Review operational performance and relationship behavior in the same forum.", "Separate supplier-caused issues from problems created by unclear internal demand.", "Use joint improvement actions for strategic suppliers, not only penalties.", "Escalate early when transparency declines even before service levels fail.", "In every Supplier Relationship Health review, record the customer impact, risk tradeoff, accountable owner, and next review date alongside the metric movement." ] }, { "key": "drivers", "title": "何が数字を動かすか", "text": "Breaking the topic into drivers shows which operating action is likely to move the result. Issue transparency | Hidden problems reduce recovery time | Track whether bad news arrives early Demand clarity | Unclear forecasts create supplier misses | Check internal forecast quality before blaming the supplier Commercial fairness | Unsustainable economics reduce investment | Review margin pressure and change-request behavior", "items": [ "Issue transparency | Hidden problems reduce recovery time | Track whether bad news arrives early", "Demand clarity | Unclear forecasts create supplier misses | Check internal forecast quality before blaming the supplier", "Commercial fairness | Unsustainable economics reduce investment | Review margin pressure and change-request behavior" ] } ], "misunderstandings": [ { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴", "text": null, "items": [ "A supplier can meet the SLA while hiding deteriorating transparency.", "Relationship health is not a reason to ignore concentration risk.", "Repeated emergencies may indicate poor demand planning, not only supplier failure." ] } ], "examples": [ { "key": "examples", "title": "最小例", "text": "A hardware team sees on-time delivery remain green while defect explanations become slower and less specific. It holds a joint health review, discovers a subcontractor change, and agrees on earlier exception reporting plus a second-source test. In this example, Supplier Relationship Health is treated as an operating decision that connects constraints, ownership, measurement, and review, so the team can reassess the change using the same evidence later.", "items": [] } ], "comparisons": [ { "key": "comparisons", "title": "似ている言葉との違い", "text": "Procurement strategy | Chooses the sourcing model | Supplier relationship health monitors whether the chosen relationship is still working Vendor concentration risk | Measures dependency severity | Relationship health measures reliability and collaboration quality Service level design | Defines service commitments | Supplier relationship health checks whether supplier behavior can meet them", "items": [ "Procurement strategy | Chooses the sourcing model | Supplier relationship health monitors whether the chosen relationship is still working", "Vendor concentration risk | Measures dependency severity | Relationship health measures reliability and collaboration quality", "Service level design | Defines service commitments | Supplier relationship health checks whether supplier behavior can meet them" ] } ], "faq": [ { "question": "What is the best early warning signal?", "answer": "Loss of transparency is often earlier than an SLA failure." }, { "question": "Should every supplier get a health review?", "answer": "Use deeper reviews for suppliers tied to critical services, high spend, high risk, or hard-to-replace capability." }, { "question": "How do we fix weak health?", "answer": "Clarify demand, assign escalation owners, agree joint improvements, and set an exit trigger if behavior does not change." } ] }, "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "sources": { "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "visible_sources": [ { "label": "Introduction to Business (OpenStax)", "url": "https://openstax.org/details/books/introduction-business", "kind": "tier_s" }, { "label": "Wikipedia reference: Supply Chain Management", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_chain_management", "kind": "supplemental" } ] }, "related_terms": [ { "topic_id": "05ce6f3b-d301-5b02-a2c0-3a6e9c4f0f26", "canonical_slug": "vendor-concentration-risk", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/vendor-concentration-risk", "title": "ベンダー集中リスク", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "5c96f8de-9847-52ca-bfda-c57537acde07", "canonical_slug": "supply-chain-management", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/supply-chain-management", "title": "サプライチェーン・マネジメント（SCM）", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "0f3f5f7e-5c9e-50dd-ad9d-655abd6b188c", "canonical_slug": "procurement-strategy", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/procurement-strategy", "title": "調達戦略", "relation_type": "related" } ], "relations": [ { "term_id": "05ce6f3b-d301-5b02-a2c0-3a6e9c4f0f26", "canonical_slug": "vendor-concentration-risk", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/vendor-concentration-risk", "display_name": "ベンダー集中リスク", "relation_type": "related", "source_relation_type": "used_together" }, { "term_id": "5c96f8de-9847-52ca-bfda-c57537acde07", "canonical_slug": "supply-chain-management", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/supply-chain-management", "display_name": "サプライチェーン・マネジメント（SCM）", "relation_type": "related", "source_relation_type": "used_together" }, { "term_id": "0f3f5f7e-5c9e-50dd-ad9d-655abd6b188c", "canonical_slug": "procurement-strategy", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/ko-KR/core/procurement-strategy", "display_name": "調達戦略", "relation_type": "related", "source_relation_type": "related" } ], "chunk_ids": [ "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:definition:a3993fd2ee4ea42d", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:boundary:6ec035ee9401e6f6", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:meaning:8762622f4809ebf4", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:usage:8bd9b997422c1bf0", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:usage:b7bb4c2b85706ff4", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:drivers:e2df1b0cadc9fa12", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:misunderstandings:75f798ece108635f", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:examples:14d67a3ba2a93cf5", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:comparisons:dd500cf2ee2d4377", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:faq:198eb03300944fd9", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:faq:311cc4653807d473", "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:faq:184b9b96c3417a65" ], "chunks": [ { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:definition:a3993fd2ee4ea42d", "section_key": "definition", "heading": "一言でいうと", "text": "Supplier Relationship Health is the practical assessment of whether an important supplier relationship is reliable, transparent, economically sound, and able to improve. It is used for whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship by reading delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed and deciding whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "a3993fd2ee4ea42d2cca22e6da7538349126eeaf7c88491b6ca91039d36ef229" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:boundary:6ec035ee9401e6f6", "section_key": "boundary", "heading": "含めるもの / 含めないもの", "text": "Keep the inclusion and exclusion rules stable so decisions can be compared over time. Include | performance, transparency, responsiveness, commercial balance, improvement actions | Health includes both results and relationship behavior Exclude | friendliness without delivery evidence, price alone, isolated anecdotes | They can misread the relationship Define explicitly | service threshold, escalation owner, joint review cadence, exit trigger | Healthy relationships still need decision rules Include | performance, transparency, responsiveness, commercial balance, improvement actions | Health includes both results and relationship behavior Exclude | friendliness without delivery evidence, price alone, isolated anecdotes | They can misread the relationship Define explicitly | service threshold, escalation owner, joint review cadence, exit trigger | Healthy relationships still need decision rules", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "6ec035ee9401e6f665f9d903be84a3986e398b7ce96e7397a988f1b22e33fa62" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:meaning:8762622f4809ebf4", "section_key": "meaning", "heading": "意味", "text": "Supplier Relationship Health is a practical concept for improving operating, risk, and organization decisions. It makes delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed visible under shared assumptions so teams can decide whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship. Without clear supplier relationship health boundaries, owners, and review cadence, teams can improve one local view while moving supplier relationship health pressure elsewhere.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "8762622f4809ebf4721f51e44928704e0b1f09831e853884c22507a3cbb13ea5" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:usage:8bd9b997422c1bf0", "section_key": "usage", "heading": "役立つ場面", "text": "Supplier Relationship Health changes decisions by turning delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed into evidence for where scarce capacity and budget should go. It sets boundaries so improvement, control, resilience, and customer impact can be weighed in the same review. It makes whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship operational by naming owners, triggers, and review cadence instead of leaving the concept as a discussion point. Supplier Relationship Health changes decisions by turning delivery reliability, quality trend, issue transparency, commercial fairness, innovation contribution, and escalation speed into evidence for where scarce capacity and budget should go. It sets boundaries so improvement, control, resilience, and customer impact can be weighed in the same review. It makes whether to deepen, fix, diversify, renegotiate, or exit the supplier relationship operational by naming owners, triggers, and review cadence instead of leaving the concept as a discussion point.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "8bd9b997422c1bf0d18fd32412c7e2c3150b02bc05c55ceafbd473c5e903a5ca" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:usage:b7bb4c2b85706ff4", "section_key": "usage", "heading": "使い方のポイント", "text": "Review operational performance and relationship behavior in the same forum. Separate supplier-caused issues from problems created by unclear internal demand. Use joint improvement actions for strategic suppliers, not only penalties. Escalate early when transparency declines even before service levels fail. In every Supplier Relationship Health review, record the customer impact, risk tradeoff, accountable owner, and next review date alongside the metric movement.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "b7bb4c2b85706ff4cb602756097ec64d1a9c494551a0bdf9c9836549f0b54cb9" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:drivers:e2df1b0cadc9fa12", "section_key": "drivers", "heading": "何が数字を動かすか", "text": "Breaking the topic into drivers shows which operating action is likely to move the result. Issue transparency | Hidden problems reduce recovery time | Track whether bad news arrives early Demand clarity | Unclear forecasts create supplier misses | Check internal forecast quality before blaming the supplier Commercial fairness | Unsustainable economics reduce investment | Review margin pressure and change-request behavior Issue transparency | Hidden problems reduce recovery time | Track whether bad news arrives early Demand clarity | Unclear forecasts create supplier misses | Check internal forecast quality before blaming the supplier Commercial fairness | Unsustainable economics reduce investment | Review margin pressure and change-request behavior", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "e2df1b0cadc9fa1245ac069da27db7a79434764b3bd56a4517b3b5324c56ff8c" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:misunderstandings:75f798ece108635f", "section_key": "misunderstandings", "heading": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴", "text": "A supplier can meet the SLA while hiding deteriorating transparency. Relationship health is not a reason to ignore concentration risk. Repeated emergencies may indicate poor demand planning, not only supplier failure.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "75f798ece108635f99ab0981c2451b5915a4e948207178b59165124d769bba3c" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:examples:14d67a3ba2a93cf5", "section_key": "examples", "heading": "最小例", "text": "A hardware team sees on-time delivery remain green while defect explanations become slower and less specific. It holds a joint health review, discovers a subcontractor change, and agrees on earlier exception reporting plus a second-source test. In this example, Supplier Relationship Health is treated as an operating decision that connects constraints, ownership, measurement, and review, so the team can reassess the change using the same evidence later.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "14d67a3ba2a93cf5156d9a513afcd36d988716be07e5980a04b8c3902cc73b66" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:comparisons:dd500cf2ee2d4377", "section_key": "comparisons", "heading": "似ている言葉との違い", "text": "Procurement strategy | Chooses the sourcing model | Supplier relationship health monitors whether the chosen relationship is still working Vendor concentration risk | Measures dependency severity | Relationship health measures reliability and collaboration quality Service level design | Defines service commitments | Supplier relationship health checks whether supplier behavior can meet them Procurement strategy | Chooses the sourcing model | Supplier relationship health monitors whether the chosen relationship is still working Vendor concentration risk | Measures dependency severity | Relationship health measures reliability and collaboration quality Service level design | Defines service commitments | Supplier relationship health checks whether supplier behavior can meet them", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "dd500cf2ee2d43775251d4f8b6db767e3ee42b80676edac4240f091278a5b103" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:faq:198eb03300944fd9", "section_key": "faq", "heading": "What is the best early warning signal?", "text": "What is the best early warning signal? Loss of transparency is often earlier than an SLA failure.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "198eb03300944fd9b3291b469f614b4276a310f95415cea3dfb27e42763c66fd" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:faq:311cc4653807d473", "section_key": "faq", "heading": "Should every supplier get a health review?", "text": "Should every supplier get a health review? Use deeper reviews for suppliers tied to critical services, high spend, high risk, or hard-to-replace capability.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "311cc4653807d4733ade1bcd441db7f92c37d15ad6c720bfeda98a9daa787a9e" }, { "chunk_id": "core:chunk:supplier-relationship-health:ko-KR:faq:184b9b96c3417a65", "section_key": "faq", "heading": "How do we fix weak health?", "text": "How do we fix weak health? Clarify demand, assign escalation owners, agree joint improvements, and set an exit trigger if behavior does not change.", "source_refs": [ "concept:business-concept-0147:en-US", "concept:business-concept-0147:ja-JP", "manual_promotion_packet:synthetic-business-concepts-batch2-2026-04-28" ], "content_hash": "184b9b96c3417a657d0b56771597330c3cd07e64119e738ff9b5f64900acc76b" } ], "content_hash": "ba832a2dd4678ee118a88f683f0034f7484dbe30e1e1ca602e59af72783f08fa", "hash_algorithm": "sha256", "rag": { "chunk_id_policy": "core:chunk:{canonical_slug}:{locale}:{section_key}:{sha256_16}", "content_hash_policy": "sha256_stable_json", "source_refs_precision": "source_object_ref_or_source_key_current_snapshot" }, "quality": { "content_tier": "db_backed", "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "source_count": 2, "last_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z", "trust_policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "limitations": { "policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22", "professional_advice_boundary": "reference_only_not_professional_advice", "text": "이 페이지는 조사와 학습을 위한 참조 정보입니다. 회계, 법무, 금융, 의료, 보안 등 개별 판단은 1차 출처나 전문가 확인을 우선하세요.", "items": [ "공개 페이지는 일반 이해와 실무 맥락을 돕는 자료이며, 개별 사안의 전문 조언이 아닙니다.", "제도, 가격, 규제, 회계 기준, 제품 사양처럼 빠르게 변하는 정보는 최종 판단 전에 1차 출처를 확인해야 합니다.", "AI 지원 제작·감사 흐름을 사용하더라도 공개 여부는 품질 게이트와 사람이 읽을 수 있는 증거에 기반해 다룹니다." ] } }